Credit Costar
Across the commercial real estate landscape, one question is gaining urgency: can healthier buildings deliver stronger returns? For certain asset classes and markets, the answer is yes. On The Real Finds Podcast, we have explored how health-driven design and operations can move the needle on both occupancy and income, particularly when targeting specific types of tenants in competitive or under-performing markets.
The value of a healthier building is not the same in every location. In top-tier downtown office towers that already command high rents and have long waiting lists, the incremental gains from health features may be smaller. The real upside often appears in markets and property types where differentiation is critical.
For example, Class B and C office properties in secondary or suburban markets often compete against newer, better-located buildings. In these situations, adding wellness features such as advanced air filtration, improved natural lighting, biophilic design, and WELL or Fitwel certification can shift tenant perception from “budget option” to “smart business choice.” In our podcast conversations with operators, we have seen landlords use these investments to reposition older assets, attract tenants they previously could not reach, and justify higher rental rates.
Similarly, industrial owners serving life sciences, food production, or high-tech manufacturing tenants have found that health features, including better air quality and worker-friendly layouts, make their facilities more attractive to ESG-focused occupiers. This can be the deciding factor for tenants who are willing to sign longer leases and pay a premium for spaces that align with their corporate values.
The data shows a strong business case for healthier buildings.
A study by MIT’s Real Estate Innovation Lab found that buildings with WELL or Fitwel certification earn 4.4 to 7.7 percent more rent per square foot than uncertified equivalents. In competitive markets, that difference can determine whether a property maintains high occupancy or struggles with vacancy.
LEED-certified buildings cost about $2.53 less per square foot to operate, which represents a 7.4 percent reduction in operating expenses. This saving drops directly to net operating income, raising asset value.
According to the U.S. Green Building Council, LEED buildings also have nearly 20 percent lower maintenance costs, and retrofits can cut operating costs by 10 percent within a year.
The International WELL Building Institute calculates that healthy building strategies produce $18.65 in profit per square foot each year, along with $3,395 in profit per employee.
Over a ten-year horizon, that translates to $129 in net present value per square foot and $23,584 per employee, considering productivity gains, reduced turnover, and operational savings.
WELL-certified offices report a 28 percent increase in employee satisfaction, while higher ventilation rates alone can yield an 8 percent performance boost. Some workplace wellness programs deliver returns of up to 300 percent.
The return profile of a healthy office building often depends on the tenants. Knowledge-based industries such as technology, finance, and professional services place a high value on employee well-being because it directly affects productivity and retention. A law firm deciding between two similar office locations will often choose the one with superior indoor environmental quality, even at a higher rent, because the cost of losing a high-performing attorney far outweighs the rent differential.
For industrial and logistics tenants, healthier building features can help meet compliance standards in sectors like pharmaceuticals or specialty food production, which require better air handling and strict environmental controls. In these niches, health investments become both a leasing advantage and a requirement for doing business.
In retail and hospitality, healthier building features can translate into higher customer dwell times, greater spend per visit, and stronger brand loyalty. These factors allow owners to charge higher rents to tenants who can directly link sales growth to an improved building environment.
On The Real Finds Podcast, we have spoken with landlords who repositioned suburban office campuses by integrating wellness-focused features into both the physical space and property operations. In one case, a landlord in a midwestern secondary market introduced advanced HVAC filtration, expanded green space, and flexible work areas with abundant natural light. This repositioning attracted a major healthcare technology tenant that had previously only considered urban Class A office space. The tenant signed a long-term lease at a rental rate 6 percent above the submarket average, reducing the property’s vacancy from 22 percent to under 5 percent within 18 months.
In another episode, we examined how an industrial owner upgraded an older manufacturing facility for a life sciences client. They implemented improved ventilation systems, daylighting strategies, and ergonomic work areas. The investment not only secured the lease but also justified a rent premium of nearly 8 percent compared to similar facilities without the upgrades. That deal increased the property’s appraised value by more than 12 percent within a year.
Owners and investors considering healthy building upgrades should weigh three factors. First, assess the competitiveness of the market. If the property is in a crowded field where differentiation is difficult, wellness features can provide a clear advantage. Second, look closely at the tenant mix. If current or target tenants are in sectors that value wellness, compliance, or ESG reporting, they may be willing to pay for documented health benefits. Third, determine capital availability. Upgrades should be targeted toward improvements that will deliver measurable rent premiums or cost savings within the first lease cycle after completion.
When these conditions align, healthier building investments can transform a property’s financial performance.
Beyond immediate rent and cost impacts, healthier buildings can reduce long-term risk. Properties with strong health and sustainability credentials tend to attract more stable tenants, maintain higher occupancy during downturns, and appeal to a broader range of buyers. For investors concerned about resale, this can translate into higher sale prices and shorter marketing periods.
Health investments can also help future-proof assets against evolving regulations and tenant expectations. Just as energy efficiency has shifted from a differentiator to a baseline requirement, health-focused features are likely to become standard in many markets over the next decade. Owners who act early position themselves ahead of the curve.
The profitability of a healthier building is supported by hard data. Across multiple asset types, wellness-driven upgrades can increase rent, reduce costs, improve tenant retention, and enhance long-term value. On The Real Finds Podcast, case studies show that in the right markets, with the right tenant profile, healthy buildings are not just a passing trend. They are a proven strategy for stronger returns and a more resilient portfolio.
For more on ways to differentiate your asset in the marketplace, reach out to our landlord representation team at Van Vlissingen and Co.
Your Office Was Designed For Someone Who Does Not Exist There has always been a…
Caregiving, Building For A Longevity Society, And The Future Of Work With Marisa Toldo —…
The office market has spent the better part of four years trying to answer the…
On this episode of The Real Finds Podcast, I sat down with Mike Herl, SIOR…
Rick Owens To Open Chicago Flagship At 932 W. Fulton Street, Chicago Global fashion designer…