Work has undergone a transformation over the past few years that few could have predicted. Remote work became the default for many industries during the pandemic. Now, with more office space reopening and return-to-office (RTO) policies rolling out, companies are facing a new challenge: figuring out how to measure productivity to reflect the realities of modern work.
For decades, productivity was measured using basic metrics like hours worked, time spent at a desk, and attendance. These metrics made sense in a factory or traditional office setting, where output was tied directly to physical presence. However, these measurements no longer provide an accurate picture in today’s knowledge economy. The RTO conversation provides an opportunity to rethink how we define productive work and, more importantly, how we evaluate it.
Many leaders continue to rely on outdated indicators of productivity, such as:
Time logged in to internal systems
Number of meetings attended
Days physically spent in the office
These surface-level metrics offer little insight into the actual value being created. In fact, they can often reward the wrong behaviors. Attending more meetings does not necessarily lead to better decisions, and being online for ten hours a day does not mean the work produced is impactful or meaningful.
Instead of measuring effort or visibility, modern productivity metrics should focus on effectiveness, outcomes, and alignment with business goals.
Across various industries, forward-thinking leaders are shifting toward new ways of assessing productivity. Here are a few examples, supported by recent data:
Companies like Microsoft and Salesforce are moving away from activity tracking and focusing instead on whether employees are meeting goals and delivering results. In Microsoft’s 2023 Work Trend Index, 87 percent of managers said that outcomes, not hours worked should measure employee productivity.
By setting clear objectives and key results (OKRs), teams can be evaluated based on what they accomplish, not how long they spend doing it. This approach allows employees to work in ways that suit their individual styles while still aligning with company priorities.
According to Gallup’s 2023 State of the Global Workplace report, highly engaged teams are 18 percent more productive and 23 percent more profitable than disengaged teams. This has led many organizations to implement ongoing engagement surveys, pulse checks, and anonymous feedback platforms.
When employees feel heard, trusted, and valued, they are more likely to contribute meaningfully. Engagement levels are now being treated not just as an HR concern, but as a core business performance metric.
With remote and hybrid work becoming the norm, many organizations use data from platforms like Slack, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams to understand collaboration patterns. Tools like Microsoft Viva can offer insights into time spent on focused work versus meetings or interruptions.
These metrics help leaders understand whether employees are stuck in low-value administrative work or are able to dedicate time to deep, focused tasks. Rather than punishing employees for not being online at certain times, companies can use this data to reduce inefficiencies and encourage smarter workflows.
One of the most high-profile examples of changing productivity frameworks and 5-day return-to-office mandates comes from Amazon. In early 2025, CEO Andy Jassy announced major organizational changes to reduce bureaucracy and increase efficiency. Specifically, Amazon intends to increase the ratio of individual contributors to managers by 15 percent.
In a leaked internal meeting, Jassy criticized what he called “manager fiefdoms,” where leaders build large teams to gain influence without necessarily improving results. He stressed that Amazon’s focus must be on speed, ownership, and meritocracy. The company created a system for employees to anonymously report unnecessary processes or roadblocks, which led to more than 375 operational changes.
This restructuring effort is not just about headcount. It reflects a belief that modern productivity comes from empowering individuals, not stacking layers of oversight.
Many companies are implementing strict return-to-office policies in hopes of reviving productivity. But without rethinking how productivity is measured, forcing employees back into the office can create frustration and attrition instead of results.
Instead of equating office presence with output, organizations should focus on building systems that measure impact regardless of location. For example:
Evaluate whether hybrid teams are meeting project goals at the same rate as fully in-person teams
Use collaboration metrics to identify communication breakdowns, not to monitor individuals
Invest in management training that focuses on coaching and outcomes rather than surveillance
A return to the office can offer benefits like improved team cohesion and faster decision-making. But those gains will only materialize if leaders know what success actually looks like.
Focus on results, not hours
Encourage teams to set clear goals, timelines, and deliverables. Measure whether those goals are met—not how long someone stayed online to do it.
Track engagement and well-being
Use regular surveys and feedback tools to understand how employees feel about their work. Burnout, disconnection, and lack of purpose often lead to real productivity loss.
Redesign performance reviews
Shift the conversation away from input-focused evaluations. Focus instead on initiative, collaboration, innovation, and contribution to key company outcomes.
Audit your management structure
Like Amazon, evaluate whether your teams have the right balance between oversight and autonomy. Fewer, better managers often lead to faster decisions and greater agility.
Use data responsibly
Collect data on collaboration and performance trends, but use it to support—not surveil—your teams. Transparency about what is being measured helps build trust.
As we move into a post-pandemic work environment, companies must resist the temptation to measure productivity with a backward-looking lens. The future of work demands that we measure what actually matters: impact, alignment, and the ability to adapt.
Amazon’s recent restructuring is one sign that even the largest companies are rethinking their definition of productivity. As more organizations adopt hybrid and flexible models, this evolution will become not just a trend but a requirement.
The return to the office should not be a return to outdated thinking. Businesses can build a more resilient, effective, and motivated workforce with better metrics, clearer goals, and a culture that values contribution over visibility.
Building a $400M Small Bay Industrial Portfolio With Frank Forte Frank Forte did not take…
Effective local advertising can significantly enhance the visibility of your industrial property and attract potential…
Introduction Industrial real estate continues to be one of the strongest-performing commercial asset classes, driven…
https://youtu.be/leJCEcvBvAw Why the Listing Description Is Your First Negotiation In industrial real estate, deals are…
Why a Move-In Plan Matters? https://youtu.be/zyQGzGZYmN4 Relocating a business to a new office is one…
Most commercial real estate decisions about office space are built on occupancy data that is,…